Hill v. Hetzel et al
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 Amended Complaint, filed by Bruce Lamar Hill. The motion to proceed IFP is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/25/2014. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
BRUCE LAMAR HILL,
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00135-KD-B
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, 1 the Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 9) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
and dated January 23, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Without
Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 2) is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Final judgment in accordance with this Order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
58 shall be entered by separate document.
DONE and ORDERED this the 25th day of March 2014.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court notes that, on Plaintiff’s motion, the deadline for filing objections was
extended from February 13, 2014, to March 14, 2014. (Doc. 11).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?