Stallworth et al v. Rai-Cho

Filing 52

JUDGMENT entered that Plaintiff Tanisha Stallworths claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of1964, as amended, are dismissed with prejudice and JUDGMENT is entered in favor ofdefendant Guyoung Tech USA, Inc. and against plaintiff Tanish a Stallworth as to Count I of theamended complaint; and Stallworths state law claims against defendants Jin Rae Cho andGuyoung Tech USA, Inc., are dismissed without prejudice and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/30/14. (cmj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TANISHA STALLWORTH,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
GUYOUNG TECH USA, INC., and
JIN RAE CHO,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00202-KD-N

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED
and DECREED as follows:
1) Plaintiff Tanisha Stallworth’s claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, are dismissed with prejudice and JUDGMENT is entered in favor of
defendant Guyoung Tech USA, Inc. and against plaintiff Tanisha Stallworth as to Count I of the
amended complaint; and
2) Plaintiff Tanisha Stallworth’s state law claims against defendants Jin Rae Cho and
Guyoung Tech USA, Inc., are dismissed without prejudice and the Court declines to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
DONE this the 30th day of May 2014.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE