Anderson v. Thomas

Filing 7

JUDGMENT that Pet's 2 MOTION for Leave to File Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED & the 1 Successive Petition be DISMISSED w/PREJUDICE as set out. Pet is not entitled to a certificate of appealability & is therefore not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/20/2013. (copy mailed to Pet on 8/21/13) (tot)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL DEWAYNE ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
vs.
WILLIE THOMAS, WARDEN,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0363-CG-N

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Michael Dewayne Anderson’s motion seeking
permission to file a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 2) be
DENIED and that the successive habeas corpus petition (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED
with PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, due to Anderson’s failure to comply with
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).
Further, the petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and is
therefore not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of August, 2013.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE