Maisonet et al v. Pfizer Inc.
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING (26) Motion to Stay in case 1:13-cv-00502-CG-N, (25) Motion to Stay in case 1:13-cv-00503-CG-N, (26) Motion to Stay in case 1:13-cv-00504-CG-N. All proceedings are STAYED as set out pending receipt of the JPML's confirmation of its order transferring this action to the District of South Carolina. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 2/25/2014. Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-00502-CG-N, 1:13-cv-00503-CG-N, 1:13-cv-00504-CG-N (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
AMINA MAISONET,
and YUSEF MAISONET,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PFIZER INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________
ANNE G. TAYLOR,
and LOWELL TAYLOR,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PFIZER INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________
JANNIE MITCHELL ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PFIZER INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0502-CG-N
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0503-CG-N
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0504-CG-N
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings, to
which the parties attached a copy of the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation’s
(“JPML”) Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1), conditionally transferring a number
of actions from various districts, including the above-styled cases, to the District of
South Carolina for inclusion in the Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales
Practices and Products Liability Litigation (No. II), MDL No. 2502.
Upon due consideration, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and all
proceedings in the above-styled actions, including the deadline for filing the Rule
26(f) report, are STAYED pending receipt of the JPML’s confirmation of its order
transferring this action to the District of South Carolina.
DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2014.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?