Fanning v. McCaskil

Filing 5

JUDGMENT that Plf Fanning's 2 Motion to Proceed w/o Prepayment of Fees is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED w/o prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i), & that this action is counted as a strike for purposes of future IFP eligibility under §1915(g), in that it is malicious. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 3/10/2014. (copy mailed to Plf on 3/10/14) (tot)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DUANE EARL FANNING, III
(AIS # 263799)
Plaintiff,
vs.
COI ERIC MCCASKIL,
Defendant.

*
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0540-CG-C

JUDGMENT
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff
Fanning's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 2) is DENIED, that this
action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and
that action is counted as a strike for purposes of future IFP eligibility under § 1915(g), in
that it is malicious.
DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE