Reaser v. Mobile County Metro Jail
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Terrance Reaser. TERMINATING 7 Motion for Settlement out of Court filed by Terrance Reaser.. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 6/2/2014. (adk)
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
FOR
THE
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
OF
ALABAMA
SOUTHERN
DIVISION
TERRANCE
REASER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MOBILE
COUNTY
JAIL,
et
al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL
ACTION
NO.
14-‐00117-‐CB-‐C
ORDER
The
Magistrate
Judge
has
entered
a
Report
and
Recommendation
(Doc.
6)
recommending
that
this
action
be
dismissed
without
prejudice
for
failure
to
prosecute
and
failure
to
obey
the
Court’s
order.
After
the
Plaintiff
filed
an
incomplete
motion
to
proceed
in
forma
pauperis
(IFP),
the
Magistrate
Judge
entered
an
order
denying
the
IFP
motion.
The
order
also
granted
leave
to
refile
the
IFP
motion
with
a
completed
Financial
Certificate
and
a
copy
of
the
institutional
record
attached.
The
order
also
explained
that
Plaintiff
could,
alternatively,
pay
the
$350
filing
fee.
Finally,
Plaintiff
was
warned
that
failure
to
comply
with
one
of
these
two
alternatives
by
April
17,
2014
would
result
in
the
dismissal
of
this
action.
Plaintiff
did
not
comply
with
the
Magistrate
Judge’s
order.
He
neither
refiled
his
IFP
motion
as
required
nor
paid
the
$350.00
filing
fee.
He
has
not
filed
an
objection
to
the
Report
and
Recommendation.
Instead,
he
has
submitted
a
statement
that
he
wishes
to
settle
his
case
(Doc.
7)
and
a
separate
statement
setting
forth
his
settlement
demands-‐-‐$2,999
and
“a
car.
.
.
a
1971
Charger
or
Gto
[sic]
in
good
shape.”
(Doc.
8.)
Plaintiff’s
settlement
demands
do
not
qualify
as
an
objection
to
the
Report
and
Recommendation
of
the
Magistrate
Judge
which
is
hereby
ADOPTED
as
the
opinion
of
his
Court
pursuant
to
28
U.S.C.
§
636(b)(1).
DONE
and
ORDERED
this
the
2nd
day
of
June,
2014.
s/Charles
R.
Butler,
Jr.
Senior
United
States
District
Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?