Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office et al
ORDER ADOPTING the 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ordered that this action be dismissed as a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) andthat Kennedy is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, and consequently, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 5/22/2014. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
RICHARD DARON KENNEDY,
MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0195-WS-B
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the
issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation
to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED
that this action be DISMISSED as a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) and
that Kennedy is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, and consequently, is not entitled to
appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE this 22nd day of May, 2014.
s/WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?