Broadhead v. McCovery et al
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING 74 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that: Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants Wayne Gray, Amanuel DuBose, Anthony Gibson, and Timothy Wetzel. Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Defendants Cynthia McCover y and Shirley Smith; claims of failure to protect remain against them in their individual capacities. Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Defendants Tyus, McKenzie, Smith, Fountain, Pacheco, and McQuirter; claims of excessive force and assault remain against them in their individual capacities. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 4/11/2016. copies to parties. (sdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHERMAN ANTWAN BROADHEAD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CYNTHIA D. McCOVERY, et. al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00216-CB-N
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been
no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28
U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that:
1.
Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants Wayne Gray, Amanuel
DuBose, Anthony Gibson, and Timothy Wetzel.
2.
Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Defendants Cynthia McCovery and Shirley
Smith; claims of failure to protect remain against them in their individual capacities.
3.
Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Defendants Tyus, McKenzie, Smith, Fountain,
Pacheco, and McQuirter; claims of excessive force and assault remain against them in
their individual capacities.
There being no just reason for delay, the Court will separately enter final
judgment in favor of Defendants Wayne Gray, Amanuel DuBose, Anthony Gibson,
and Timothy Wetzel in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2016.
s/Charles R. Butler, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?