Carrier et al v. Navika Capital Group, LLC et al

Filing 70

JUDGMENT entered that the Defendants Amended Motion to DismissPlaintiffs Amended Complaint and Supporting Memorandum of Law (the AmendedMotion to Dismiss) (Doc. 36) be (a) GRANTED to the extent that the following claimsare dismissed under FED R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6): all of Jauran Portis claims; any of AundreaPoellnitzs claims that accrued prior to August 2, 2009; any of Theresa Fords claims thataccrued prior to June 30, 2009; any of Linda Laws claims that accrued prior to July 13,2009; any of Lakitha Reeds claims that accrued prior to July 10, 2009; and any of RobbieWilliams claims that accrued prior to July 12, 2009; and (b) DENIED in all otheraspects.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/17/2016. (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION THERESA FORD, et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : NAVIKA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, et al., : Defendants. CA 14-00311-KD-C : JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and Supporting Memorandum of Law (the “Amended Motion to Dismiss”) (Doc. 36) be (a) GRANTED to the extent that the following claims are dismissed under FED R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6): all of Jauran Portis’ claims; any of Aundrea Poellnitz’s claims that accrued prior to August 2, 2009; any of Theresa Ford’s claims that accrued prior to June 30, 2009; any of Linda Law’s claims that accrued prior to July 13, 2009; any of Lakitha Reed’s claims that accrued prior to July 10, 2009; and any of Robbie Williams’ claims that accrued prior to July 12, 2009; and (b) DENIED in all other aspects. DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of March 2016. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?