Carrier et al v. Navika Capital Group, LLC et al
Filing
97
STIPULATED JUDGMENT. The Release and Settlement Agreements are approved. Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and Bill of Costs are granted in part and denied in part such that Plaintiffs are awarded $33,571.16 in attorneys' fees for the main litigation, $2120 in attorneys' fees for the fees motion and the costs in the amount of $400. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/17/2017. (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
THERESA FORD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NAVIKA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION 14-00311-KD-C
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Order (Doc. 85) approving the Release and Settlement Agreements
(Doc. 84-1 through Doc. 84-7) and the Order issued on this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED that the respective settlements between each of the seven (7) Plaintiffs Theresa Ford
($160), Jamie Franklin ($5,300), Cynthia Knight ($8,000), Linda Law ($900), Aundrea Poellnitz
($6,000), Lakitha Reed ($10,600) and Robbie Williams ($10,600) and Defendants Navika Capital
Group, LLC, Silverstone Hospitality, Inc. and Naveen C. Shah, are APPROVED as fair and
reasonable resolutions of bona fide disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) provisions.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’
fees (Doc. 93) and Bill of Costs (Doc. 94) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part such that
Plaintiffs are awarded $33,571.16 in attorneys’ fees for the main litigation, $2,120 in attorneys’ fees
for the fees motion and costs in the amount of $400.
The Court does not retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreements.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED this the 17th day of April 2017.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?