Pettway v. Stewart

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING the 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Cynthia Stewart and Nautical King, motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Mandingo Pettway are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 4/5/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MANDINGO PETTWAY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CYNTHIA STEWART, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION 14-0495-WS-C

ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation
to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) on February 22, 2016 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Defendants’, Cynthia Stewart and Nautical King,1 motion for
summary judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Mandingo
Pettway are DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE this 5th day of April, 2016.
s/WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The complaint names Nautical King as the Classification Specialist at G.K. Fountain
Correctional Facility (“Fountain”) and a defendant in this action. (Doc. 1 at 5). Defendants’
pleadings identify Nanciata King as the Classification Supervisor at Fountain. (See Docs. 12,
13). Given that “Nautical King” has been used in the caption of this case and has yet to be
changed by the clerk’s office, the court will continue to use the name “Nautical King” in its
order and judgment but notes that the correct identification of Defendant King is Nanciata
King.