Pettway v. Stewart
ORDER ADOPTING the 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Cynthia Stewart and Nautical King, motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Mandingo Pettway are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 4/5/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CYNTHIA STEWART, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION 14-0495-WS-C
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation
to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) on February 22, 2016 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Defendants’, Cynthia Stewart and Nautical King,1 motion for
summary judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Mandingo
Pettway are DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 5th day of April, 2016.
s/WILLIAM H. STEELE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The complaint names Nautical King as the Classification Specialist at G.K. Fountain
Correctional Facility (“Fountain”) and a defendant in this action. (Doc. 1 at 5). Defendants’
pleadings identify Nanciata King as the Classification Supervisor at Fountain. (See Docs. 12,
13). Given that “Nautical King” has been used in the caption of this case and has yet to be
changed by the clerk’s office, the court will continue to use the name “Nautical King” in its
order and judgment but notes that the correct identification of Defendant King is Nanciata
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?