Radford v. Marshall et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Thomas Radford denying the motion without prejudice as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/29/15. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS RADFORD, Plaintiff, v. C. MARSHALL, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 14-00527-KD-C ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated January 7, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED the Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 10, 12) are DENIED without prejudice. DONE and ORDERED this the 29th day of January 2015. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?