Lightsey v. Meigs et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that the action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1915 (e) (2) (B) (i) and (ii), because the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or arefrivolous, or are barred by the principles of Heck v. Humphrey, 51,2 U.S.477 (1994). Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/26/2015. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRTCT

COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DTSTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVTSION

EMMA LTGHTSBY, #238811,

Plainti ff,
CIVIL

VS.

JACK MEIGS ,

êt âf.

ACTTON 15-91-WS-M

,

Defendants.
ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this
file

deemed

relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. S 636(b) (1) (B) is

ADOpTED

as the opinion of this Court.
It is

ORDERED

that action be and is hereby

DISMISSED

with

prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S
1915 (e) (2) (B)

(i) and (ii),

because the cl-aims either fail

to

state a cl-aim upon which relief can be granted, or are
frivolous, or are barred by the principles of Heck v.
51,2

Humphrey,

U.S.477 (1994).
DONE

this

JþLaay or j. *l<

2075.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTR]CT

JUDGE