Lightsey v. Meigs et al
ORDER ADOPTING the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that the action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1915 (e) (2) (B) (i) and (ii), because the claims either fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or arefrivolous, or are barred by the principles of Heck v. Humphrey, 51,2 U.S.477 (1994). Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/26/2015. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRTCT
COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DTSTRICT OF ALABAMA
EMMA LTGHTSBY, #238811,
JACK MEIGS ,
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this
relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo
determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation
to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. S 636(b) (1) (B) is
as the opinion of this Court.
that action be and is hereby
prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S
1915 (e) (2) (B)
(i) and (ii),
because the cl-aims either fail
state a cl-aim upon which relief can be granted, or are
frivolous, or are barred by the principles of Heck v.
JþLaay or j. *l<
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTR]CT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?