Keshock et al v. Metabowerke GMBH et al
ORDER, Plfs' Cross-Objections to the R&R are stricken as untimely. 39 MOTION to Strike, 42 MOTION to Strike are GRANTED. 36 Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED. Plfs' 14 MOTION to Remand is GRANTED, & this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, as set out. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V.S. Granade on 3/9/2016. (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MICHAEL KESHOCK, et al,
METABOWERKE GMBH, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0345-CG-N
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 36), Metabo Defendants’ Objection to the R&R and
Memorandum in support (Docs. 37, 41), Plaintiffs’ Response to the Objection and
Cross-Objections to the R&R (Doc. 38), Defendants Perciavalle, Bell and
Blankenfeld’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Cross-Objections (Doc. 39), Plaintiffs’
Response in Opposition to the Motion to Strike (Doc. 40), Metabo Defendants’ Motion
to Strike Plaintiffs’ Cross-Objection (Doc. 42), and Metabo Defendants’ Response to
Plaintiffs’ Cross-Objection (Doc. 43).
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, the Court finds that
Plaintiffs’ Cross-Objections to the R&R are due to be stricken as untimely, and
hereby GRANTS the motions to strike (Docs. 39 & 42). Further, upon a de novo
consideration of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made,
the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B)
and dated September 25, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and as such, this case is
REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Mobile, County, Alabama, from whence it
DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?