Smith v. The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division. ADHR's motion to dismiss is granted under FRCP 12(b )(1) and the claims against Ms. Anderson are dismissed sua sponte under 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), such that all of Smith's claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/30/2016. (copy mailed) (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION THADDEUS D. SMITH, SR., Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00629-KD-N ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and dated June 3, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Division’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and that the claims against Ms. Anderson are DISMISSED sua sponte under 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) & (iii), such that all of Smith’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, final judgment shall be entered accordingly by separate document DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of June 2016. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?