Broadhead v. Rogers et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by James Broadhead, dismissing this action without prejudice, prior to service, pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/10/2016. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES BROADHEAD, Plaintiff, vs. D. ROGERS, et. al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00631-KD-M ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), dated January 20, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.1 It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of March 2016. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Broadhead sent a letter to the Court dated January 16, 2016. (Doc. 3). The letter contains a second complaint, which both repeats the allegations of the instant complaint and contains slightly different allegations. The Court construes this letter as a motion to amend the complaint. However, the “amended” complaint does not allege that Broadhead was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time of the complaint’s filing. See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 2 at 3-4). Accordingly, any new allegations in the amended complaint do not impact the findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?