Broussard v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the opinion of this Court; granting Defendant PennMac's 4 MOTION to Dismiss as to Count II and denying motion as to Count I. Plaintiff's amended complaint due as set forth in Order by 9/14/2016. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/30/2016. (copy to Pltf) (mab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION TRACY LYNNE BREECH BROUSSARD Plaintiffs, vs. CITIMORTGAGE INC, and PENNYMAC CORP., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0149-CG-M ORDER After due and proper consideration of the relevant pleadings and the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be granted as to PennyMac as to Count II (TILA violations and wire fraud) and denied as to Count I (wrongful foreclosure and fraud). Therefore, Count II of the Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED as to Defendant, PennyMac Corp. The Court sua sponte extends the time for Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies in the allegations for wrongful foreclosure and fraud pointed out by the Magistrate Judge . The amended complaint is due no later than September 14, 2016. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the Court’s Order could result in dismissal of the claims against Defendant PennyMac. DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2016. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?