Carstarphen v. Smith et al
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as set out. Plaintiff's Motion to Release (docs. 5, 14, 15 are denied and Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (docs. 10 & 11) are granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/14/2016. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ANDRE CARSTARPHEN, SR.,
JUDGE ROBERT SMITH and
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-00170-KD-N
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections
filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and
dated October 19, 2016, is ADOPTED, in part,1 as the opinion of this Court, as follows:
The Court adopts Section I, Section II (a), Section II (b)(3) & (4).
The Court declines to adopt Sections II (b)(1) & (2).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion to Release Andre Carstarphen Jr.
immediately” (Docs. 5, 14, 15) is DENIED, that the Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. 10, 11)
are GRANTED), and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, final judgment shall be entered by
DONE and ORDERED this the 14th day of November 2016.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations
made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?