Cunningham v. Mr. Knous et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The remaining claims against Dft Gloria McClain are DISMISSED without prejudice sua sponte for Plf's failure to make the required payments under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) or, alternatively, for failure to prosecute & obey the Court's orders as set out. All claims having been dismissed, all pending motions are MOOT. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/10/2017. (copy mailed to Plf on 8/10/17) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, JR., Plaintiff, vs. MR. KNOUS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-180-CG-N ORDER After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 40) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated July 19, 2017, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the remaining claims against Defendant Gloria McClain are DISMISSED without prejudice sua sponte for the Plaintiff’s failure to make the required payments under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) or, alternatively, for failure to prosecute and obey the Court’s orders under both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court’s inherent authority to manage its docket. All claims having been dismissed, it is further ORDERED that all pending motions are MOOT. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly by separate document in accordance with this Order, the Court’s June 9, 2017 Order granting summary judgment to the other Defendants (Doc. 39), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2017. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?