SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Olson et al
ORDER denying 2 Plaintiff SE Property Holdings, LLC's motion to enter judgment as fully set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/20/2016. (mcb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC.,
CARL RICHARD OLSON, et al,
MISC. ACTION NO. 16-0007-KD
This action is before the Court on the motion to enter judgment filed by Plaintiff SE
Property Holdings, LLC (doc. 2), the objection and memorandum in support filed by Defendants
Carl Richard Olson and Elaine Olson (docs. 4, 6), the objection and memorandum in support filed
by Defendants Rupert Phillips and Sandra Phillips (doc. 7, 11), and Seph’s reply (doc. 12). 1
Seph moves the Court to enter a money judgment against the Olsons and the Phillips based
upon a Declaratory Judgment entered by the Northern District of Florida, which Seph has registered
in this Court (docs. 1, 2). The Declaratory Judgment makes three specific declarations as between
HCB Financial Inc. and Seph, the parties to the Judgment. Among those, is a declaration that Seph
“is entitled to engage in its own collection efforts” to collect on deficiency judgment entered by the
Circuit Court of Walton County, Florida. The Olsons and Phillips were guarantors on the
underlying loan that gave rise to the deficiency judgment.
Federal law provides for the “registration of judgments for enforcement in other districts”
and the statute sets forth, in relevant part, as follows:
A judgment in an action for the recovery of money or property entered in any . . .
The Olsons’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply (doc. 13) is MOOT.
district court, . . . may be registered by filing a certified copy of the judgment in
any other district . . . when the judgment has become final by appeal or expiration
of the time for appeal or when ordered by the court that entered the judgment for
good cause shown. . . . A judgment so registered shall have the same effect as a
judgment of the district court of the district where registered and may be enforced
in like manner.
28 U.S.C. § 1983.
Thus, a judgment to recover money may be registered in this district and have the same
effect as any other judgment entered here. However, the Declaratory Judgment was not a
“judgment in an action for the recovery of money.” Id. Instead, Seph sought a declaration of rights
under certain agreements between Seph and HCB or their predecessors in interest, as to Seph’s
entitlement to collect on the deficiency judgment entered by the state court. Registering the
Declaratory Judgment in this Court does not change its character or purpose. It does not become a
“judgment … for the recovery of money” because of Seph’s registration under the statute.
Accordingly, Seph’s motion to enter judgment is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of July 2016.
s / Kristi K DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?