Walker v. State Of Alabama
Filing
9
JUDGMENT that Pet's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED without prejudice due to Pet's failure to comply w/28 U.S.C. §2244(b)(3)(A). Pet is not entitled to a certificate of appealability &, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/23/2017. (copy mailed to Pet on 6/23/17) (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARREL B. WALKER,
AIS 124886,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF ALABAMA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION 17-0067-CG-MU
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(Doc. 1) be DISMISSED without prejudice due to petitioner’s failure to comply with
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability
and, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2017.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?