Walker v. State Of Alabama

Filing 9

JUDGMENT that Pet's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED without prejudice due to Pet's failure to comply w/28 U.S.C. §2244(b)(3)(A). Pet is not entitled to a certificate of appealability &, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/23/2017. (copy mailed to Pet on 6/23/17) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DARREL B. WALKER, AIS 124886, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 17-0067-CG-MU JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED without prejudice due to petitioner’s failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2017. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?