Collins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiff may seek leave to amend his 2nd amended complaint for purposes of eliminating the fraud count by 3/21/18. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/14/18. (srr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-00093-N
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Michael Collins’ (“Plaintiff”)
Unopposed Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 27). Plaintiff seeks to dismiss his fraud claim
against Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Defendant”). As
grounds, Plaintiff cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(2).1 If Plaintiff’s
fraud claim were dismissed, Plaintiff’s negligence and wantonness claims seeking
uninsured motorist coverage would remain pending against Defendant. (See Second
Amended Complaint, Doc. 20
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has held, “…Rule 41 allows a
plaintiff to dismiss all of his claims against a particular defendant; its text does not
permit plaintiffs to pick and choose, dismissing only particular claims within an
action. A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action
should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss under Rule 41(a).”
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides: “Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may
be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers
proper….Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004)(internal
quotation and citation omitted). Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) is DENIED. However, on or before Wednesday, March
21, 2018 Plaintiff may seek leave to amend his Second Amended Complaint for
purposes of eliminating the fraud count.2 Any motion shall comply with Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 15(a) and S.D. Ala. CivLR. 15.3
DONE and ORDERED this the 14th day of March 2018.
/s/ Katherine P. Nelson
KATHERINE P. NELSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Though the deadline for amending the pleadings set forth in the Court’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)
Scheduling Order (Doc. 17) has expired, given the limited purpose of the amendment, as well as
Defendant’s likely consent to the amendment, it is likely that good cause for modification of this
deadline will be present.
3 S.D. Ala Civ LR 15 states:
(a) Any amendment to a pleading, whether filed as a matter of course or upon a motion
to amend, must reproduce the entire pleading as amended and may not incorporate
any prior pleading by reference.
(b) A motion to amend a pleading must state specifically what changes are sought by
the proposed amendments. The proposed amended pleading must be filed as an
attachment to the motion to amend.
(c) If the Court grants the motion to amend, the party must promptly file the amended
pleading. If a responsive pleading is required, any party that has appeared in the
action and was served with the proposed amended pleading must serve an answer or
other responsive pleading within fourteen (14) days after the Court grants the motion
to amend. The time for a party that has not appeared in the action to serve an answer
or other responsive pleading begins to run when that party is properly served with the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?