Kennedy v. Warren Properties, LLC et al

Filing 77

ORDER ADOPTING 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 59 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard Colbourne, Joanne C. Warren, Frank R. Warren, Ronald T. Warren. Kennedy's claims against those Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. It is further ordered that those Defendants' 63 Motion to Strike is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 03/14/2018. (nah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION D. ANGELINA KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. WARREN PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-00114-KD-N ) ) ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 72) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and dated February 8, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 59) filed by Defendants Frank Warren, JoAnn Warren, Richard Colbourne, and Ronald Warren is GRANTED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) or, alternatively, under Federal Rule 12(b)(4), and that Kennedy’s claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that those Defendants’ motion to strike (Doc. 63) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED this the 14th day of March 2018. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?