Sunil Gupta, M.D., LLC v. Lauten

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting 34 Motion to Dismiss. The 35 Second and/or Renewed Motion to Abstain is denied as moot and this action is dismissed without prejudice, subject to the Plaintiff's ability to move to reinstate this action within a reasonable amount of time if it can demonstrate that it is unable to reassert its claims in the selected forum. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/5/18. (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION SUNIL GUPTA, M.D., LLC d/b/a Retina Specialty Institute, Plaintiff, v. WRIGHT B. LAUTEN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-00136-KD-N ORDER After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendations (Docs. 40, 41) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and dated January 12, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens (Doc. 34) filed by Defendant Wright B. Lauten is GRANTED, that Lauten’s “Second and/or Renewed Motion to Abstain” (Doc. 35) is DENIED as moot, and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, subject to the Plaintiff’s ability to move to reinstate this action within a reasonable amount of time if it can demonstrate that it is unable to reassert its claims in the selected forum. Final judgment in accordance with this order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 shall be entered by separate document. DONE and ORDERED this the 5th day of February 2018. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?