Pen-One Acquisition Group, LLC v. Samsung Elecronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS with the following addition/revision as the opinion of this Court: the word "alleged" is addes as requested (i.e., "acts of alleged infringement," doc. 30 at 3). The Joint MOTION to Transfer to the Northern District of California is granted and this action is TRANSFERRED IN ITS ENTIRETY to the Northern District of California, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), which MOOTS SEAs motion to dismiss for improper venue (Doc. 17). Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/30/17. (cmj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION PEN-ONE ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., et al,) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION 17-00180-KD-MU ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made (Doc. 31), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 30) made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and S.D. Ala. Gen. LR 72(b), and dated October 4, 2017, is ADOPTED with the following addition/revision as the opinion of this Court: the word “alleged” is added as requested (i.e., “acts of alleged infringement,” Doc. 30 at 3)). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to transfer venue (Doc. 29) is GRANTED and this action is TRANSFERRED IN ITS ENTIRETY to the Northern District of California per 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), rendering Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) MOOT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this case to the Northern District of California. DONE and ORDERED this the 30th day of October 2017. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DUBOSE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?