Parker v. Berryhill
Filing
28
JUDGMENT entered. For those reasons announced by the Court on the record at the conclusion of the hearing, it is determined the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence and the same is due to be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 3/16/2018. (eec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KYLE J. PARKER,
Plaintiff,
:
:
vs.
:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Action Commissioner of
Social Security,
:
:
:
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00212-C
:
FINAL JUDGMENT
Social Security Claimant/Plaintiff Kyle J. Parker brought this action under 42
U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the
Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his
applications for child’s insurance benefits (“CIB”) under Title II of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq., and supplemental security income (“SSI”)
under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq.
The parties
have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c), for all proceedings in this Court. (Doc. 24 (“In accordance with
the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case
consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all proceedings
in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and conduct all
post-judgment proceedings.”)).
Upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, (Docs. 14 & 17), the
administrative record, (Doc. 11), and the arguments that were presented during the
hearing that was held on March 14, 2018, (Doc. 25), for those reasons announced by
the Court on the record at the conclusion of the hearing, it is determined the
Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and the same is due to
be AFFIRMED.1
DONE and ORDERED this the 16th day of March 2018.
s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Any appeal taken from this memorandum opinion and order and judgment shall be made
to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. (See Doc. 24 (“An appeal from a judgment
entered by a Magistrate Judge shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals
for this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this
district court.”)).
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?