Cruitt v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is thus further ORDERED that the 18 Motion to Enlarge Time for Filing Complaint, 23 Motion t o Set Aside Document 22, 28 Motion for Emergency Hearing Regarding Emergency Injunctive Relief Requested in the Amended Complaint, and 30 Motion for Emergency Hearing Regarding Emergency Injunctive Relief and Continuing Injunctive Requested in the Amended Complaint Six Corrected are DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 05/23/2019. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (nah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KEITH BRIAN CRUITT,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MOBILE, ALA., et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION 1:18-00119-KD-B

ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues
raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 4, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of
process, for his failure to comply with the Court’s Orders.
It is thus further ORDERED that the Motion to Enlarge Time for Filing Complaint (Doc.
18), Motion to Set Aside Document 22 (Doc. 23), Motion for Emergency Hearing Regarding
Emergency Injunctive Relief Requested in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 28), and Motion for
Emergency Hearing Regarding Emergency Injunctive Relief and Continuing Injunctive Requested
in the Amended Complaint Six Corrected (Doc. 30), are DENIED as MOOT.
DONE and ORDERED this the 23rd day of May 2019.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE