Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plf's #4 objections are OVERRULED; (2) The Magistrate Judge's #3 Recommendation is adopted; (3) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama under 28 USC 1404; DIRECTING the Clerk to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this action; This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/6/2021. (wcl, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/7/2021.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JOSEPH PADGETT, #281 611,
JEFFERSON DUNN, COMMISSIONER,
) CIVIL NO. 2:20-CV-1021-WHA-JTA
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the court transfer
Plaintiff’s complaint to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Doc.
3. Plaintiff has filed objections. Doc. 4. Based upon an independent and de novo review of the
Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds the
Recommendation adequately addresses and properly rejects the grounds for Plaintiff’s objections
and that the objections lack merit. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 4) are OVERRULED.
(2) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 3) is adopted.
(3) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Alabama under 28 U.S.C. § 1404.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer
of this action.
This case is closed in this court.
Done, this 6th day of January 2021.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?