Whigham v. United States of America
Order DIRECTING Clerk to file the instant 1 "Petition for a Federal Detainer to be Run In-Concurrent with a State Sentence" in Criminal Case No. 77-00112-KD & terminate this civil action as set out. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/3/21. (copy mailed to Pet on 6/4/21) (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ROBERT WIGHAM, AIS # 144210,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-192-TFM-B
Pending before the Court is the Petition for a Federal Detainer to Be Run In-Concurrent
with a State Sentence. Doc. 1, filed April 15, 2021. Petitioner Robert Lee Williams,1 an Alabama
state prison inmate proceeding pro se, moves the Court “for a federal detainer to be run inconcurrent with [his] state sentence of life with parole possible, which was imposed on Oct. 2,
1986.” Id. at 1. Essentially, it appears that Williams seeks to modify his 1987 federal-custody
sentence to run concurrently, rather than consecutively, with his 1986 state sentence of life with
the possibility of parole, thus obviating the need for a federal detainer.
Although the caption of Williams’s petition lists “Criminal Action No. 77-000112-KD,”see
id., the petition was not docketed in Williams’s existing criminal case, United States v. Robert Lee
The instant petition was filed under the name “Robert Whigham,” and the petitioner is listed as
“Robert Lee Wigham” by the Alabama Department of Corrections. See Doc. 1 at 3; Inmate Search,
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, http://www.doc.state.al.us/InmateHistory (search “AIS
#” 144210). However, because this Court’s records reflect the petitioner’s name is “Robert Lee
Williams,” the undersigned will use the name “Williams” when referring to the petitioner in this
Page 1 of 3
Williams, No. 77-cr-00112-KD (S.D. Ala. 1977) (hereinafter, “Williams I”).2 Instead, Williams’s
petition was assigned a new civil case number and docketed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
This Court’s records reflect that in January 1978, Williams entered a plea of guilty to the
federal offense of possession of an unregistered firearm. The Court sentenced Williams to three
(3) years in prison but suspended the sentence and placed him on probation for three (3) years,
with the sentence to run “consecutive to all state charges” and “the probationary period to
commence upon defendant’s final release from state custody.” See Williams I, ECF No. 1-1.
At some point between Williams’s January 1978 guilty plea and October 1986, he was
released from state custody and began serving his federal sentence. On June 16, 1986, while
Williams was serving his federal probationary period, he was sentenced to fifteen years in prison
for burglary by the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. On October 2, 1986, that same
court sentenced Williams to life in prison with the possibility of parole for murder.3 On October
20, 1986, a federal detainer warrant was entered in Williams’s state-court record. See Williams I,
ECF No. 1 at 6. On March 24, 1987, this Court revoked Williams’s probation and sentenced him
to the custody of the Attorney General for three (3) years. Id., ECF No. 1-1.
Since then, Williams has made repeated attempts to have this Court modify his federal
sentence to run concurrently with his state life sentence, rather than consecutively. For example,
in a § 2255 motion that was filed in 2003, Williams asked the Court to reconsider its March 1987
This appears to be due to the fact that the name of the petitioner listed on the instant petition
(Robert Whigham) is different from the name of the defendant in the criminal case (Robert Lee
Alabama Department of Corrections records indicate that Williams’s 1986 burglary and murder
sentences are consecutive.
Page 2 of 3
order and modify his federal sentence to run concurrently with his state life sentence, rather than
consecutively. The Court denied Williams’s § 2255 motion, finding it untimely and without merit.
Robert Lee Williams v. United States, No. 03-cv-00399-BH (S.D. Ala. 2003), ECF No. 1, 2, 4.
In 2014, Williams filed a motion in his criminal case in which he moved the Court appoint
counsel to assist him to obtain the release of his federal detainer. Williams I, ECF No. 1. In that
motion, which the Court denied, Williams asserted, as he does in the instant petition, a federal
detainer was “adversely affecting his rights and priviledges [sic] in state custody such as parole,
custody level reduction, work & community release, and rehab. programs.” Id., ECF. No. 1, 3.
Most recently, in 2018, Williams unsuccessfully moved the Court, in his criminal case, modify his
sentence to run “concurrent with all other cases whether federal or state to satisfy the Due Process
clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id., ECF No. 4, 5.
Based on the foregoing, it is apparent that the instant petition seeks the modification of
Williams’s federal custody sentence in Williams I, and the Court finds that the petition should be
filed in that case. Accordingly, the CLERK OF COURT is DIRECTED to file the instant
“Petition for a Federal Detainer to Be Run In-Concurrent with a State Sentence” (Doc. 1) in
Criminal No. 77-00112-KD, and to terminate Civil Action No. 21-cv-00192-TFM-B.
DONE and ORDERED this the 3rd day of June 2021.
s/Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?