Thomas v. Smith et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court. This civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set out. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 5/8/2024. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (fz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION BRENDON L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DEE SMITH and ALABAMA CREDIT UNION, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-00248-JB-N ORDER After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5) dated April 11, 2024—made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)—is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice (1) for failure to pay the statutory filing and administrative fees for this action or show entitlement to in forma pauperis status; and, additionally and alternatively, (2) for failure to obey a court order, under both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court’s inherent authority to manage its docket. Judgment in accordance with this order shall hereafter be set out by separate document, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of May, 2024. /s/ JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?