Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/27/2024. (meh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM N. LUCY, AIS# 204880 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, et al., Defendants. CIV. A. NO. 24-00028-KD-N ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection (doc. 11) is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE this 27th day of March 2024. s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?