Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/27/2024. (meh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM N. LUCY, AIS# 204880

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, et al.,
Defendants.

CIV. A. NO. 24-00028-KD-N

ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to
the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the
Recommendation to which objection (doc. 11) is made, the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of
this Court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees is DENIED
and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
DONE this 27th day of March 2024.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE