Dees v. Social Security Administration
Order re: 1 Complaint filed by Tina Dees. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to file an amended complaint that complies with Rule 8(a) as set out. ( Amended complaint deadline set for 2/16/2009.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 2/2/09. (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TINA DEES, o/b/o TEASHA REEVES Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Civil Action 08-00667-KD-B
ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated (Doc. 1). the instant action.
In initiating this action, Plaintiff submitted a single
paragraph asking for "Social Security Income" for her daughter, along with documents purportedly relating to her daughter. The
paragraph, which is being treated as Plaintiff's Complaint, is not adequate because it does not comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Even though Plaintiff filed this action as a pro se litigant, she is still required to plead a complaint that complies with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of Escambia, Fla., 132 F.3d 1359, 1369 (11th Cir. 1998) (holding that "even in the case of pro se litigants a court [does not have] license to serve as de facto counsel for a party . . . , or to re-write an otherwise deficient pleading in order to sustain an action. . . ." (citations omitted)); Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863, 110 S.Ct. 180, 107 L.Ed.2d 135 (1989) (finding that a pro se litigant is subject to a court's rules and to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).
Rule 8(a) provides: (a) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief . . . shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends . . ., (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. District courts, when confronted with a complaint that does not comply with Rule 8(a), have been instructed by the Eleventh Circuit to "intervene at the earliest possible moment in the proceedings and . . . require that the plaintiff replead his entire case." Pelletier v. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465, 1522 (11th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 855, 112 S.Ct. 167, 116 L.Ed.2d 131 (1991). Furthermore, the failure to plead a complaint that complies with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), after being required to replead a complaint, will result in the dismissal of the action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court's order. Id.
A review of Plaintiff's Complaint reflects that it does not comply with Rule 8(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff's counsel, who
entered an appearance in this case on December 19, 2008 (Doc. 5), is hereby ORDERED to file, by February 16, 2009, an amended complaint that complies with Rule 8(a). Plaintiff's amended
complaint will supersede the original complaint. Fritz v. Standard Life
The Eleventh Circuit in Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopted the decisions
In her new complaint, Plaintiff is required to provide "` a short and plain statement of the claim' that will give the
defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Leatherman v. Tarrant County
Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 1163, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). to indicate merely that the plaintiff "`It is not enough, a grievance but
sufficient detail must be given so that the defendant, and the Court, can obtain a fair idea of what the plaintiff is complaining, and can see that there is some legal basis for recovery." Inc. v. Crow, 49 F.3d 679, 684 (11th Cir. 1995). DONE this 2nd day of February, 2009. /s/ Sonja F. Bivins UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L.S.T.,
of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior October 1, 1981.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?