Hancock v. Hood et al
Order re: 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Hancock. Plaintiff to supplement his motion as set out. ( Miscellaneous/supplement deadline set for 2/2/2009.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 1/21/09. (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID HANCOCK, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES HOOD, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : ORDER Plaintiff, an Alabama prison inmate proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 1). Not
CIVIL ACTION 09-0026-KD-M
later than February 2, 2009, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement his motion to proceed without prepayment of fees with a statement of his prison account for the last six months prior to filing of the motion. Failure to comply with this Order within the
prescribed time, will result in the denial of the motion, and Plaintiff will then be required to pay the $350.00 filing fee. DONE this 21st day of January, 2009.
s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?