Brown v. Goodman et al
Order denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stanley L. Brown. Plaintiff is granted leave to refile his IFP motion with account information or pay the filing fee. ( Miscellaneous deadline set for 3/19/2009.). Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/17/09. (order and IFP form mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
STANLEY L. BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. WARDEN GOODMAN, et al., Defendants.
: : : : : CIVIL ACTION 09-0064-KD-C
ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 2) did not have attached a copy of the institutional record of his inmate account reflecting transactions in his account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint on February 6, 2009. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(2). Plaintiff merely submitted a recapitulation of his account's averages, which does not reflect the transactions in his account as required by statute. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 2) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to re-file his Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees by March 19, 2009, with the statutorily required copy of the institutional record of his inmate account reflecting transactions in his account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint attached, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), or to pay the $350.00 filing fee by March 19, 2009. The failure to comply with this order within the prescribed time will result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and to comply with the Court's
order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a form for a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees. DONE this 17th day of February, 2009.
s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?