Lolley v. Louisiana Correctional Services et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft John Doe I & John Doe II are dismissed w/o prejudice; the Supplement (Doc. 9 ) to Case No. 09-555-CG-B is GRANTED; & the Addendum & Supplement (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to add as Dfts Commissioner Allen, Director Golson, & Officer Carter & GRANTED w/respect to Dft Louisiana Correctional Services. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/9/10. (copy mailed to Plf on 6/9/10) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL KEITH LOLLEY, #207815, Plaintiff, vs. LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. : : : : : ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant John Doe I and John Doe II are dismissed without prejudice (Doc. 4)1; that the Supplement to Case Number 09-00555-CG-B (Doc. 9) is GRANTED; and that the Addendum and Supplement (Doc. 10) is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to add as Defendants Commissioner Allen, Director Golson, and Officer Carter, and GRANTED with respect to Defendant Louisiana Correctional Services. DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2010. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 As noted in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff may amend his complaint to include the identities of those fictious defendants who are dismissed without prejudice if plaintiff obtains that information through discovery or otherwise within the statute of limitations. CIVIL ACTION 09-00555-CG-B

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?