Dixon v. City of Selma et al

Filing 56

ORDER ADOPTING 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND 53 DENYING MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Felicia Owens Dixon ref. Judge DuBose. (copy mailed to Appellant). (jal) (Motions terminated: 55 MOOTING 2ND MOTION for Leave to A ppeal in forma pauperis, 53 DENYING MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Felicia Owens Dixon, 54 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/14/2011. (Mailed copy to Appellant, e-mailed USCA). (jal)

Download PDF
Dixon v. City of Selma et al Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION FELICIA OWENS DIXON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SELMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No. 2:09-00684-KD-N ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and dated March 2, 2011, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and plaintiff's motion to appeal in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED.1 DONE this March 14, 2010. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Court notes that plaintiff filed a second motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (doc. 55) after the first motion was received from the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (doc. 53), and after entry of the report and recommendation (doc. 54). The information contained in the second motion is nearly identical to the information contained in the first motion. By adopting the report and recommendation, the second motion is now MOOT. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?