Ivory et al v. Mullins et al

Filing 22

Order re: 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas. The undersigned would simply note that the filing of this statement was unnecessary since the named defendants are not a corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, syndicate, or other similar entity. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 6/2/2011. (sdb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

SAMUEL EARL IVORY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

:
:

vs.

:

GOVERNOR ROBERT BENTLEY,
et al.,

CA 11-0135-KD-C

:
:

Defendants.

ORDER
The named defendants have filed a document entitled conflict disclosure statement
(Doc. 18) in accordance with Local Rule 3.4. The undersigned would simply note that the
filing of this statement was unnecessary since the named defendants are not a
corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, syndicate, or other similar entity
(compare id. at 1 (defendants’ Bentley, Thomas, and Strange identify themselves as
individuals and/or government entities) with SD ALA LR 3.4(a) (“A corporation,
association, joint venture, partnership, syndicate, or other similar entity appearing as a
party or amicus in any proceeding shall file a Disclosure Statement, at the time of the
filing of the initial pleading, or other court paper on behalf of that party or as otherwise
ordered by the court, identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that

1

have issued shares or debt securities to the public.”)).
DONE and ORDERED this the 2nd day of June, 2011.
s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2