Pritchett v. Bates et al

Filing 12

ORDER GRANTING Plf's 11 MOTION for Leave of Court to Amend Complaint & Objection to 9 Report & Recommendation as set out. 9 Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED, & this action is DISMISSED in its entirety, prior to service of process, as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/22/2013. (copy mailed to Plf on 7/23/13) (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KENNETH PRITCHETT, #277934, Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT BATES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0084-CG-B ORDER This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) and plaintiff’s Motion for Leave of Court to Amend Complaint and Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11). Having considered the motion to amend complaint, it is hereby GRANTED. However, even considering the additional allegations contained in the newly amended complaint, they do nothing to address the findings of the Magistrate Judge concerning judicial immunity as to defendant Judge Hardaway, and concerning the lack of a causal connection between any actions of defendant Sheriff Bates and the claims alleged in the amended complaint. Accordingly, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to he issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED in its entirety, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28. U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2013. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?