Rogers v. City Of Selma et al
Filing
42
JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts City Of Selma, Blanks, Riley, & Muhannad & against Plf Michael Donald Rogers. Plf's claims against Dfts are DISMISSED w/prejudice. Costs are to be taxed against Plf. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/8/2016. (tot)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL DONALD ROGERS
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF SELMA, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M
)
)
)
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Order granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is
entered in favor of Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant
Curtis Muhannad, and Investigator Ray Blanks, and against Plaintiff, Michael
Donald Rogers. It is, therefore, ORDERD that the Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant Curtis Muhannad,
and Investigator Ray Blanks, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are
to be taxed against the Plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2016.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?