Rogers v. City Of Selma et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts City Of Selma, Blanks, Riley, & Muhannad & against Plf Michael Donald Rogers. Plf's claims against Dfts are DISMISSED w/prejudice. Costs are to be taxed against Plf. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/8/2016. (tot)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DONALD ROGERS Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF SELMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Order granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant Curtis Muhannad, and Investigator Ray Blanks, and against Plaintiff, Michael Donald Rogers. It is, therefore, ORDERD that the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant Curtis Muhannad, and Investigator Ray Blanks, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are to be taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2016. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?