KingLew Investments, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development et al
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Orders 4 and 7 . It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.P., that Plaintiff KingLew Investments, Inc. claims against the Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate KingLew Investments, Inc. as an active party. Plaintiff Lewis Giles Jr.'s claims against the Defendants remain in this case as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 01/08/2021. (srd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
KINGLEW INVESTMENTS, INC.,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE RURAL
DEVELOPMENT, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION 2:20-00501-KD-N
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised and a de novo determination of
those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)–(C),
Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and dated December 1, 2020, is ADOPTED
as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.P., Plaintiff KingLew
Investments, Inc.’s claims against the Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk
of Court is DIRECTED to terminate KingLew Investments, Inc. as an active party to this action.
Plaintiff Lewis Giles Jr.'s claims against the Defendants remain in this case.
DONE and ORDERED this the 8th day of January 2021.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?