Eldridge v. Armstrong et al

Filing 13

JUDGMENT - It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Petitioner Danny Louis Eldridges habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Eldridge has not exhausted all available state remedies, and pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. Copy to Petitioner. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/6/2025. (meh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANNY LOUIS ELDRIDGE, : Petitioner, : vs. : JUDGE ROBERT ARMSTRONG III, et al., : Civil Action No. 24-00270-KD-B : Respondents. JUDGMENT In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Petitioner Danny Louis Eldridge’s habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Eldridge has not exhausted all available state remedies, and pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. Eldridge is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2025. s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?