USA v. Thoms et al

Filing 182

Final Report and Recommendation, Memorandum Opinion

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, vs. TRACE RAE THOMS, and JENNIFER ANNE THOMS, 3:10-cr-069-JWS-JDR FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MOTION TO SUPPRESS (Docket No. 57) Defendants. In a recommendation filed at Docket 174, I advised that defendants’ Motion to Suppress be granted/denied. The defendant Trace Thoms filed objections at Docket No. 176. Defendant Jennifer joined in the objections at Docket 177. The government filed a response. Docket No. 181. After careful review of the objections, I decline to modify the original recommendation. However, defendant Trace Thoms’s objection that the court relied on United States v. Johns, 851 F.2d 1131 (9th Cir. 1988) for the standard of preponderance of evidence is inaccurate. “The defendant bears the burden of proving a violation under Franks by a preponderance of the evidence.” Recommendation, p.3, “The instant case is unlike United States v. Johns.” Recommendation, p.44. The motion to Suppress lacks merit and should be denied. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. Accordingly, this matter will be forwarded to the assigned district judge for his determination. DATED this 31st day of March, 2011, at Anchorage, Alaska. /s/ John D. Roberts JOHN D. ROBERTS United States Magistrate Judge 10-cr-069-JWS-JDR THOMS, Trace @57 FINAL RR Re Motion to Suppress.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?