USA v. Crawford

Filing 34

Memorandum Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
vs.

3:11-cr-105-JDR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Trial by Court

MICHAEL B. CRAWFORD,
Defendant.

This case was tried to the court on a two count Information charging
Michael Crawford with attempting to trap wolverine out of season (Count 1) and
violating the terms and conditions of his permit (Count 2). For reasons discussed
below the court finds the defendant guilty as charged in Count 1 and guilty under the
first alternative charged in Count 2. Count 1 alleges that:
On or about March 1, 2011, within the District of Alaska,
within an Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, in the Mystery
Creek road system within the boundaries of the Kenai
National Wildlife Refuge, Game Management Unit 15, the

defendant, MICHAEL BYERS CRAWFORD, did attempt
to trap wolverine after the wolverine trapping season
closed on the last day of February 2011. All of which is in
violation of 16 U.S.C. § 668dd, 50 C.F.R. § 36.32(c)(1)(i),
5 AAC 84.270(14).
Count 2 alleges that:
On or about March 1, 2011, within the District of Alaska, in
the Mystery Creek road system within the boundaries of
the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, the defendant,
MICHAEL BYERS CRAWFORD, did not abide by the
terms of his National Wildlife Trapping permit, Permit
Number KENll-T23, by attempting to trap wolverine out of
season in violation of Special Condition number 1 of his
permit, failing to make every effort to prevent the capture
of non-target species in violation of Special Condition
number 6 of his permit, and operating a cubby set after the
lynx season closed on February 15, 2011 in violation of
Special Condition Specific to the Kenai National Wildlife
Refuge number 7 of his permit. All of which is in violation
of 16 U.S.C. § 668dd, 50 C.F.R. § 26.22(b).
Findings of Fact
The Special Use Application and Permit issued to Crawford on
November 6, 2010 contains ten special conditions, eights special conditions specific
to the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, and four special conditions for beaver trapping
on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. These permit conditions are set forth in the
discussion infra at p.15.

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

2

On March 1, 2011, while traveling on a snowmobile in the Kenai
National Wildlife Refuge, Refuge Officer Gary Joe Titus observed foot prints leading
to a stream bed. He parked his snowmobile and following the tracks to what he
describes as a cubby set, erected into the bank with a 330 Conibear trap at the
entrance of a tunnel leading to a piece of salmon. The tunnel was about 24 inches
long. Cut green branches covered the tunnel and there were twigs on top. A larger
stick held the Conibear trap in place. Officer Titus detected no smell near the cubby
set. According to Officer Titus this trap set was commonly used to catch lynx and
wolverine. It had no flag or attractor on it. This trap set is designated as Trap No. 1.
According to Crawford, Trap No. 1 used tainted salmon heads for bait together with
“gusto” (a commercially based skunk scent lure), and beaver castor. This bait and
scent would attract a wolverine or other predators. The hole went underneath the
log at one end with space underneath the log leading to an area where the bait was
located. There was more than one way in or out to this.
The officer concluded that because the trap could catch a wolverine it
should have been removed on the day wolverine season closed even if the trap
could legally catch other animals. The trapping seasons for wolf, coyote and beaver
were still open at the close of the season for wolverine. On March 1, 2011, the
trapping season was not open for lynx or wolverine. Titus had never seen this type
of set used for wolves or coyote. Though a Conibear 330 could catch a coyote, Titus

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

3

stated it would be better to use a 220 or a 280.

A smaller trap would have been

used to trap marten or mink. The 330 Conibears were very commonly used for a
lynx set or a wolverine set.
When Officer Titus traveled about another 30 minutes down the trail he
observed more foot prints in the snow. He discovered another 330 trap set at the
entrance to a tunnel which was about 18 inches long. This tunnel led to a natural
hole in the back. Branches were used to form the sides and top of the tunnel. There
was no flag and a piece of fish was located in the back of the tunnel. Officer Titus
did not smell anything at the trap set at trial but he readily admitted at trial that his
sense of smell was not good. This trap set is designated as Trap No. 2.
Both trap sets had tags with the name of Crawford on them. The
Refuge Officer’s registry indicated that Michael Crawford and Scott Judah were
trapping in 2010-11 season as partners using traps with the name Crawford on
them.
In order to hold or use a permit for trapping in the Kenai Refuge the
trapper needs a current State Trapping License and must attend a three and one
half hour orientation class offered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at the Refuge
headquarters. The trapping permit for the Refuge is free.
In Game Unit 15, where the traps were set, lynx season closed
February 15, 2011. Pursuant to Special Condition No. 7 of the Permit “cubby and

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

4

flag sets” are not allowed when lynx season is closed.

In the opinion of Officer

Titus, a person using a cubby and flag set after February 15 would violate Permit
Conditions 6 and 7 because this type of set is used to trap lynx. Official records
showed that in the past three years with more than 300,000 trappers registered, only
four wolves had been taken from over two million acres of land in the Refuge.
Crawford used snares and leg hold traps for wolves. A Conibear 330 is not a typical
wolf trap.
Michael Crawford obtained his first trapping license in 2003 or 2004.
He is a life member of the Alaska Trapper’s Association and past president of the
Kenai Peninsula Trapper’s Association. He sat on the Kenai Soldotna Fish and
Game Advisory Commission and served as chairman of it for four and one half
years. He has been a board member and president of Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula
Chapter of the Safari’s Club International. Crawford taught a portion of the
orientation class on the Kenai Refuge for two years.
Crawford started trapping in 2010 on December 1, when the Refuge
opened up to snowmobiling. He knew that he needed to remove his flag and cubby
sets by February 15, the last day of lynx trapping season. He was aware of the
requirements of the Special Permit.
On February 28, 2011, he and Scott Judah had four trap sets out. They
intended to remove them before the wolverine season closed because the sets

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

5

potentially could catch a wolverine. Crawford thought that if a wolverine came down
the creek it would likely go into one of his sets. Judah was called out of town the
end of February 2011 and he was unable to remove the sets before Officer Titus
located them.
The parties disagree over the definition of a cubby and flag set. A
cubby set has been a frequent topic of discussion at annual trapping meetings on
the Kenai Peninsula. At some of the meetings of the Trappers Association, Officer
Titus was called upon to explain the use of cubbies. According to Titus’ testimony,
the cubby set prohibition against trapping is specific to this particular Refuge.
Officer Titus stated that a cubby set in this particular refuge targets only
lynx or wolverine. In his opinion a cubby does not need a flag. He referred to
pictures of cubbies in magazines and journals but admitted there was no clear
definition of cubby. At one point in his testimony Officer Titus called any type of hole
whether natural or covered, a cubby. According to Officer Titus a cubby has a trap
at an entrance that forms a tunnel with one way in and one way out. It can vary in
size or depth. Officer Titus testified that using a newspaper container with the ends
cut off and a Conibear trap in front pushed into a bank would qualify as a cubby and
thus be precluded even though a lynx could not squeeze into it. The Officer
acknowledged that he has seen cubby sets, flag sets, and cubby sets with some
type of attractor. The Officer considers it a violation when a trap is set for a certain

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

6

type of animal out of season regardless of the trapper’s intent. Alaska State law
does not prohibit cubby sets and/or flag sets after the close of lynx season.
Ted Spraker testified as an expert trapper for the defense. Mr. Spraker
worked for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for almost 30 years and is a
retired wildlife biologist. As a management biologist for the State he conducted
surveys on all big game species, furbearers and small game. He is currently serving
his fourth term on the Alaska Board of Game. He has trapped the Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge almost every year since 1978 and is a long standing member of the
Alaska Trappers Association. He admitted that he had no clear understanding of
what constitutes a cubby set.
Mr. Spraker stated that the use of a flag or attractor with a cubby is
considered a lynx cubby set. According to Spraker a cubby set is almost always
associated with catching lynx and if one were going to trap for lynx he would use an
attractor such as a wing or piece of ribbon or a CD to attract their attention. Lynx are
generally not attracted to bait that gives off an aroma. They are highly skilled
predators who prefer snow shoe hares, ptarmigan or grouse. If the set does not
have a wing or CD disk, for example, in front of it Spraker would call it a pocket set
not a cubby.
If one traps an animal when the season is closed, according to Officer
Titus, the trapper has to turn the animal into the Refuge. Officer Titus has never

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

7

charged anyone with a criminal offense under those circumstances. He testified
that he has never heard of anybody turning in an incidently caught furbearer that
was out of season.
In a recorded interview on March 8, 2011, Officer Titus queried
Crawford about the four 330 traps. Crawford acknowledged that the traps in
question were his. He told the Officer that he did not think his sets were cubby sets.
He stated that he had two cubbies in a different area during the lynx season. He
described how he made those sets which he called pocket sets. Officer Titus told
him that his sets for both Trap No. 1 and Trap No. 2 such formed a cubby which the
officer described as any type of hole, natural or covered, that could possibly attract
a lynx. Crawford responded that if you are going to call this a cubby we need a
better definition of a cubby.
During the interview Crawford stated he intended to remove the traps
before they were seized. Crawford stated that Judah was going to pull the two traps
on Sunday, February 27; but Judah forgot to pull them. He said that Judah was
going to go back Monday, February 28, but he got called out of town for work.
Crawford told Officer Titus that he thought the traps were legal for
wolves, coyotes and rabbits.

The only animals he caught were two rabbits.

Crawford stated “I was worried about catching a wolverine on the last day and
having an incidental catch issue.” For that reason he was going to pull the traps

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

8

because “most likely a [wolverine] would have been something that would have been
caught there.” Exhibit 10, Recorded Interview of Mike Crawford, p.4.
Crawford calls his sets for Traps No. 1 and 2 “pocket sets” referring to
a hole in the bank of a creek with the trap in front of the bait. Such a trap is
commonly used for mink. Lynx don’t like closed spaces and according to Officer
Titus are unlikely to be trapped in a pocket set. The two traps were baited for
wolverine using smelly bait. Crawford took no special steps to avoid the capture of
a wolverine after wolverine season closed. Mr. Spraker stated that trap No. 1 would
be a good set for wolverine and one might also expect to catch a hungry coyote.
Crawford intended to trap a wolverine using the two traps in question.
He stated that he had been told by other persons to use a Conibear in the creeks
because that’s where wolverines were caught in the past.
Discussion
A. Attempting to Trap Wolverine in violation of federal or state law
1. Applicable Law
The first count, charging attempting to trap out of season, cites three
legal sources. The first is 16 U.S.C. § 668dd. This is the catch-all general provision
governing the National Wildlife Refuge system. Subsection (a) governs refuge lands
in Alaska. Subsection (f) addresses penalties.

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

9

The second source is Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
“Wildlife and Fisheries.” Subchapter C governs “The National Wildlife Refuges.”
50 C.F.R., Subpart D, includes 36.32 the “Taking of Fish and Wildlife” and states:

The following provision shall apply to any person while
engaged in the taking of fish and wildlife within an Alaska
National Wildlife Refuge:
(1) Trapping and sport hunting.
(i) Each person shall secure and
possess all required State licenses and shall
comply with the applicable provisions of State
law unless further restricted by Federal law;
(ii) Each person shall comply with the
applicable provisions of Federal law;
(iii) In addition to the requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, each
person shall continue to secure a trapping
permit from the appropriate Refuge Manager
prior to trapping on the Kenai . . . Refuge [ ].

50 C.F.R. 26.22 gives general exceptions for entry and (b) states:
(b) A permit shall be required for any person entering a
national wildlife refuge, unless otherwise provided under
the provisions of subchapter C. The permittee will abide by
all the terms and conditions set forth in the permit.
50 C.F.R. 28.31 is entitled “General Penalty Provisions” and applies to “any person
who violates any of the provisions, rules, regulation, posted signs, or special
regulations of this subchapter C . . . .” See 50 C.F.R. 28.31(a). Both 36.32 and
26.22 fall under Subchapter C. Section 28.31(b) states:

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

10

(b) Failure of any person, utilizing the resources of any
national wildlife refuge or enjoying any privilege of use
thereon for any purpose whatsoever, to comply with any
of the provisions, conditions, restrictions, or requirements
of this subchapter C or to comply with any applicable
provisions of Federal or State law may render such person
liable to:
(1) The penalties as prescribed by law. ( Sec. 4, 76
Stat. 654, 16 U.S.C. 460k-3; Sec. 4, 80 Stat. 927,
as amended, 16 U.S.C. 668dd(e); Sec. 7, 60 Stat.
1080, 16 U.S.C. 666a; Sec. 6, 40 Stat. 756, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 707; Sec. 7, 48 Stat. 452, 16
U.S.C. 718g; Sec. 2, 33 Stat. 614, as amended, 18
U.S.C. 41.). (Emphasis added).
The cited U.S. Code Section bolded above (16 U.S.C. § 460K-3) contains the
following language:
The Secretary may establish reasonable charges and fees
and issue permits for public use of national wildlife
refuges, game ranges, national fish hatcheries, and other
conservation areas administered by the Department of the
Interior for fish and wildlife purposes. The Secretary may
issue regulations to carry out the purposes of this
subchapter. A violation of such regulations shall be a
misdemeanor with maximum penalties of
imprisonment for not more than six months, or a fine
of not more than $500, or both. The provisions of this
subchapter and any such regulation shall be enforced by
any officer or employee of the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service designated by the Secretary of the
Interior. (Emphasis added).
Section 668 (f) states:
“(1) Knowing violations Any person who knowingly
violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions of this
Act or any regulations issued thereunder shall be fined
11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

11

under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or
both. (2) Other violations Any person who otherwise
violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions of this
Act (including a regulation issued under the Act) shall be
fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than 180 days,
or both.”

The third legal source referenced in Count 1, 5 A.A.C. 84.270(14), gives
the trapping seasons for legally hunting furbearers including wolverine in the
different game units in Alaska.
Count 1 alleges that Crawford attempted to trap wolverine outside of the
trapping season in Game Management Unit 15. AS 16.05.255 provides in pertinent
part:
“(a) The Board of Game may adopt regulations it
considers advisable in accordance with AS 44.62
(Administrative Procedure Act) for . . . (2) establishing
open and closed seasons and areas for the taking of
game. The Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) states that
the time frame for legal wolverine trapping in 2010-11 is
November 10 through February 28. Crawford is alleged to
have attempted to trap wolverine on March 1, 2011.”
Under Alaska law “trapping” is defined as “[t]he taking of mammals
declared by regulation to be furbearers.” AS 16.05.940(36). “Take” is defined as
“taking . . . trapping . . . or attempting to take . . . trap, or any manner capture or kill
. . . game.” AS 16.05.940(34).
Trapping seasons and bag limits for furbearers are established in 5 AAC
84.270. Subsection 270(14) set the season for wolverines in Game Unit 15 to run
11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

12

from November 10 - February 28 with no bag limit. That regulation is made
applicable in 5 AAC 84.260 which provides: “It is lawful to trap a furbearer only in a
game management unit or a portion of a unit open to trapping in accordance with the
open season and bag limit prescribed in 5 AAC 84.270. Bag limits and open
seasons are based upon the regulatory year.” 5 AAC 84.270. Thus, trapping a
furbearer out of season in Game Unit 15 is unlawful under Alaska law.

2.

Application of law

Crawford with the help of his trapping partner Scott Judah, attempted
to trap fur bearing animals within the Refuge by setting the two traps seized by
Officer Titus on March 1, 2011, in the Mystery Creek Road System within the
boundaries of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, Game Management Unit 15. The
traps were set to catch wolverine or any other furbearer in season.
Trap No. 2 was a cubby set. Cubbies are used to catch wolverines.
Trapping for wolverine in this area with a permit during the open season is not
prohibited by the law. Trap No. 1 and No. 2 were set before the wolverine trapping
season had closed.
To “attempt” an offense means wilfully to do some act, in an effort to
bring about or accomplish something the law forbids to be done. Devitt and
Blackmore Jury Instructions, Section 14.21. A conviction for an attempt requires

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

13

proof of both “culpable intent” and “conduct constituting a substantial step toward
commission of the crime that is in pursuit of that intent.” United States v. Buffington,
815 F.2d 1292, 1301 (9th Cir. 1987); United States v. Snell, 627 F.2d 186, 187 (9th
Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 957 (1981).

The evidence establishes the

existence of both elements. A “substantial step” is “conduct strongly corroborative
of the firmness of the defendant’s criminal intent.” Id. “Culpable intent” can be
inferred from a particular defendant’s conduct and from the surrounding
circumstances. Buffington at 1302.
Crawford clearly intended the trap sets to attract a wolverine regardless
of whether the settings constituted a cubby as argued by the government. Even
though the season was still open to trap a coyote, beaver or wolf, the traps were
clearly set to catch a wolverine.

As Crawford recognized, when confronted by

Officer Titus, the most effective way to avoid trapping a wolverine after February 28,
2010 when the season closed was to remove the trap. He did not do this timely.
Crawford knew that the traps were not going to be removed by his
trapping partner before wolverine season closed. He knew that the traps were set
to attract and catch a wolverine.

By leaving the traps in place after

February 28, 2011, he negligently engaged in trapping wolverine out of season in
violation of Alaska State law. Proof that Crawford knew the traps remained set after
the close of the wolverine season for Game Unit 15, satisfies the mens rea element

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

14

under § 668dd(f)(2).1 Crawford failed to comply with applicable State law in violation
of 50 C.F.R. 26.22(b) and 28.31(b). See Orr-Hickey v. State 973.P.2d 612 (Ak. App.
1999) (hunting sheep in a closed area) citing State v. Rice, 626 P.2d 104, 110
(Alaska 1981) (civil negligence is the culpable mental state that governs hunting
offenses under Alaska State law).
Violations of Special Use Permit
Count 2 of the Information charges that Crawford violated his trapping
permit, Permit No. KEN11-T23 by violating Special Condition numbers 1 and 6, and
Special Condition specific to the Refuge, number 7.
Title 50 C.F.R. § 26.22(b) entitled “General exception for entry,” covers
exceptions for entry in a National Wildlife Refuge (of which the Kenai Refuge is a
part). The relevant portion of § 26.22 is as follows:
(b) a permit shall be required for any person entering the
National Wildlife Refuge, unless otherwise provided under
the provisions of subchapter C. The permittee will abide
by all the terms and conditions set forth in the Permit.
A. Special Condition No. 1
Crawford is accused of violating Special Condition No. 1 of his Special
use Permit by “attempting to trap wolverine out of season.” Special Condition No. 1,

1

The government argues that the offenses charged invoke a strict liability
and there is no other culpable mental state required. Under the evidence
presented the government has proved criminal negligence.
11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

15

(State and Federal Requirements) reads: “Trapping will be done in compliance with
State game laws and regulations, and may be further restricted by general and
special conditions of the Refuge Trapping Permit. Permittees will also comply with
all other regulations and conditions affecting access to and use of the Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge.”
Trapping out of season violates Alaska State law. 5 AAC 84.260. For
the reasons stated above, attempting to trap wolverine out of season violates Alaska
State law and Special Condition No. 1 of Crawford’s Special Use Permit.
B.

Special Condition No. 6.

The second means by which Crawford is alleged to have violated his
trapping permit in Count 2 is by failing to make every effort to prevent the capture of
non-target species in violation of Special Condition No. 6 of his Permit. That
condition reads: “Every effort will be made to prevent the capture of non-target
species. However, if an unauthorized animal is found alive and in satisfactory
condition in a trap, it shall be immediately released. Non-target species found dead
or seriously injured in a trap shall be immediately reported to the refuge manager.”
“Non-target species” is not defined in the Permit. The mandatory
orientation seminar may have addressed this permit requirement but neither the
special use permit itself or the evidence identifies the meaning of “non-target
species.” “Target” is defined in the dictionary as a desired goal. The American

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

16

Heritage College Dictionary, Third Edition 1993. It is used in Condition No. 7 as an
adjective for a species. The word “unauthorized” is defined as “not authorized or
not permitted.” American Heritage College Dictionary.
The literal language of Special Condition No. 6 comports with the
government’s position that a non-target species includes a fur bearing animal which
cannot legally be trapped and retained when the season for trapping that animal is
closed. In the context of Special Condition No. 6 the language suggests that nontarget species is used synonymously with “unauthorized animal.” Crawford argues
that this condition was intended to address the incidental trapping of birds, moose,
dogs or other animals not intended to be captured.
The term “non-target species” also appears in Special Condition No. 2
providing that trappers who have attended a seminar on the use of snares and who
use only snares which have been modified to allow “break away” for larger nontarget species on their trap lines are required to check snares once every seven
days in the Refuge. (emphasis added) The use of the words “non-target species”
in Special Condition No. 2 is consistent with the Defendant’s argument that it refers
to animals that are not normally trapped and does not include fur bearing animals
that may otherwise be trapped in open season. If the Defendant’s interpretation of
this condition is correct then the evidence fails to show that he has violated Permit

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

17

Condition No. 6, requiring him to make every effort to prevent the capture of nontarget species.
The government argues that when the season closed for a particular
animal that animal became a non-target species.

This interpretation seems

redundant because the permit elsewhere requires compliance with State game laws
and regulations. State law requires compliance with regulations setting closed
seasons.
Special Condition No. 6 also provides that the trapper should seek to
avoid capturing the non-target species but if one is captured then the animal should
either be immediately released or if it is dead or seriously injured in a trap then it
must be reported to the Refuge manager. The government’s view that non-target
species referenced in this permit condition includes fur bearing animals that are
captured after the close of season is problematic because the Refuge manager
would probably want to know if such animal is found in the trap even if it is released.
Yet, the government’s view allows the trapper to immediately release the
unauthorized animal if it is in satisfactory condition without reporting it to the Refuge
manager. If the drafters of the permit had intended to require a permittee to make
every effort to prevent the capture of a fur bearing animal after the season for that
animal has closed it could have so stated in clear language in the special conditions.
However, this would be redundant in part to Special Condition No. 1 in the Permit.

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

18

Only Special Condition No. 6 addresses the catching of unwanted
species. Nowhere else in the Permit is the capture of unwanted species directly
addressed. In the absence of evidence to the contrary the court concludes that
Special Condition No. 6 is intended to promote trapping methods that will reduce the
possibility of catching domestic animals and unwanted species such as birds, dogs
and moose. The Refuge is used by non-trappers for recreation. Whether Special
Condition No. 6 is also intended to address catching fur bearers after the season has
closed is speculative.
To avoid avian predators like crows, jays, eagles and magpies, the
regulations state that traps and snares must be set at least 30 feet away from any
exposed bait. The evidence indicates that exposed bait near a trap attracts birds
including eagles. Bait placed in a cubby for example, should be covered to prevent
the attraction of birds. Special Condition No. 6 addresses trap methods, not trapping
in a closed season. Permit Condition No. 7 requires the permittee to report on trap
takes of both target and non-target species. If Special Condition No. 6 were
intended to include the latter, as the government argues, that condition should have
been made more explicit.
C. Special Condition No. 7
The third theory for violating his trapping permit (alleged in Count 2) is
that Crawford operated a cubby set after the lynx season closed on

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

19

February 15, 2011 in violation of Special Condition specific to the Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge No. 7 of his Permit. Special Condition No. 7 reads: “Cubby and flag
sets are not allowed when the lynx season is closed.”
Lynx season for the Refuge closed February 15, 2011. The parties
disagree as to the definition of a cubby set and whether Crawford had a trap set up
after the close of lynx season that is prohibited by Special Condition No. 7. Refuge
Officer Titus interprets Special Condition No. 7 to prohibit a cubby set, a flag set, and
a cubby and flag set.
Cubby sets are used to catch a variety of furbearers. “The main idea
behind a cubby is to make a structure that will guide the animal into an area where
you have placed bait and lure. The cubby provides cover for the trap and bait as
well.” Alaska Trappers Manual, Exhibit 3, p.61. The Alaska Trapper’s Manual
suggests using the 330 Conibear style trap for lynx or wolverine and recommends
a different size for marten. Id. at 61.
Considering the evidence adduced at trial the ambiguity of the language
in Condition No. 7 becomes apparent. There appears to be a wide disparity among
the trapping community and the wildlife officers as to what constitutes a cubby set.
The defendant’s expert, Ted Spraker, acknowledged that you can have a cubby set
without a flag. You may have a flag set without the use of a cubby. Or, a trapper
may use a cubby and flag set to trap furbearing animals.

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

20

It is undisputed that Condition No. 7 is intended to protect the lynx
population. Thus, use of a “cubby and flag set” on the Kenai National Wildlife
Refuge is conditioned upon whether the lynx season is closed. In this case the lynx
season closed February 15, 2011. The basic description of a cubby addresses the
structure of the tunnel or cave like inclosure designed to lead the animal past a trap
to reach bait.
The government conceded in its summation that trap no. 1 displayed
in Exhibits 1 - 3, did not constitute a cubby because the setting had a second tunnel
under a log by which an animal could enter and retreat without passing by or through
the (conibear) trap. The second trap discovered by Officer Titus arguably met the
definition of a cubby set. Crawford maintains that it was not a cubby because light
could come through the branches. The illustrations and the materials admitted at
trial as exhibits show a simpler structure as a cubby.
The reference to “cubby and flag sets” in Special Condition No. 7,
however, is ambiguous with respect to the meaning of those words. This Special
Condition is unconstitutional because its language is so vague as to whether a
cubby without a flag is prohibited that it permits arbitrary enforcement. As the
defendant’s expert explained, prohibited use of a cubby set for the entire year when
lynx season is closed would preclude significant trapping in that area for other fur
bearing animals.

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

21

A lynx hunts primarily by vision which is why trappers place an attractor
or a flag at a trap site to attract the attention of the lynx. Crawford’s second trap did
not have a flag or an attractor. Moreover, the evidence indicates that scents had
been placed at the trap to attract a wolverine.
If the phrase “cubby and flag set(s)” is read as a single requirement then
Crawford’s second trap did not fall within the prohibition of Condition No. 7, because
there was no flag. If Condition No. 7 was meant to protect only Lynx it could have
specified that “cubby and flag sets or flag sets” are not allowed after the close of lynx
season. If the condition was meant to prohibit the use of a cubby for any furbearer
after the close of lynx season it could have so stated, for example: Use of a cubby
set with or without a flag is not allowed when the lynx season is closed.
The meaning of “cubby and flag sets” has been debated frequently at
recent annual trappers association meetings in Kenai, Alaska attended by the
Refuge officer. Officer Titus agreed in his recorded interview with Crawford that the
phrase needs to be clarified. As the language exists now it is subject to vagueness
because it allows persons, including law enforcement officers, trappers, and
orientation instructors to construe the language differently.

A statute is

unconstitutionally vague as applied if it does not provide the defendant adequate
notice of what conduct is prohibited. Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 822
(9th Cir. 2003). This constitutional principle applies with equal force to the language

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

22

of a permit where the government seeks criminal enforcement of proscribed conduct
in that permit. A statute is void for vagueness if it “(1) does not define the conduct
it prohibits with sufficient definiteness and (2) does not establish minimal guidelines
to govern law enforcement.” United States v. Ayala 35 F.3d 423, 424-25 (9th Cir.
1994).
For purposes of criminal enforcement the language “cubby and flag set”
in Condition No. 7 is too vague to pass constitutional muster under a void-forvagueness challenge. The language is too indefinite to prohibit a cubby without a
flag after lynx season. Wherefore, the court concludes that the government has
failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Crawford violated Specific
Condition No. 7 of his Permit.
Summary
The government has met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable
doubt that Crawford attempted to trap wolverine after the wolverine trapping season
had closed as charged in Count 1 of the Information. Because the government has
met its burden of proof as to a violation of Special Condition Number 1, the
defendant is guilty under Count 2.
The discussion of the two other conditions of the permit at issue
constitutes dicta. This opinion suggests that Special Condition No. 6, and Special
Condition specific to the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge No. 7, should be drafted

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

23

more explicitly to set forth the trapper’s responsibility and state what conduct is
prohibited.
The government clearly has the authority to regulate trapping in the
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge by imposing restrictions different from those in other
National Refuges. This opinion does not address the propriety of limiting the use of
a cubby set on the Refuge. This is the responsibility for the Refuge management and
not this court. Under separate cover a date and time will issue for imposition of
sentence.
DATED this 23rd day of March, 2012, at Anchorage, Alaska.

/s/ John D. Roberts
JOHN D. ROBERTS
United States Magistrate Judge

11-cr-105-JDR CRAWFORD Memorandum Opinion RBC.wpd

24