Graves, et al v. Arpaio, et al
Filing
2093
ORDER: 2080 Defendant Arpaio's Motion to Terminate is granted. For the convenience of the parties, those provisions of the Second Amended Judgment that remain in effect are restated in the Third Amended Judgment entered this day. FURTHER ORDERED vacating the final evidentiary hearing and oral argument set at 9:30 a.m., July 10, 2012. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 5/24/12. (NKS)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
Fred Graves, Isaac Popoca, on their own
behalf and on behalf of a class of all
pretrial detainees in the Maricopa County
Jails,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa
County; Fulton Brock, Don Stapley,
Andrew Kunasek, Max W. Wilson, and
Mary Rose Wilcox, Maricopa County
Supervisors;
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 77-00479-PHX-NVW
ORDER
19
Before the Court is Defendant Arpaio’s Motion to Terminate (Doc. 2080) certain
20
21
provisions of the Second Amended Judgment. Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion. (Doc.
22
2089.)
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Arpaio’s Motion to Terminate
24
(Doc. 2080) is granted. For the convenience of the parties, those provisions of the Second
25
Amended Judgment that remain in effect are restated in the Third Amended Judgment
26
entered this day.
27
28
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the final evidentiary hearing and oral
argument set at 9:30 a.m., July 10, 2012.
DATED this 24th day of May, 2012.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?