Graves, et al v. Arpaio, et al

Filing 2093

ORDER: 2080 Defendant Arpaio's Motion to Terminate is granted. For the convenience of the parties, those provisions of the Second Amended Judgment that remain in effect are restated in the Third Amended Judgment entered this day. FURTHER ORDERED vacating the final evidentiary hearing and oral argument set at 9:30 a.m., July 10, 2012. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 5/24/12. (NKS)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Fred Graves, Isaac Popoca, on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of all pretrial detainees in the Maricopa County Jails, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County; Fulton Brock, Don Stapley, Andrew Kunasek, Max W. Wilson, and Mary Rose Wilcox, Maricopa County Supervisors; Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 77-00479-PHX-NVW ORDER 19 Before the Court is Defendant Arpaio’s Motion to Terminate (Doc. 2080) certain 20 21 provisions of the Second Amended Judgment. Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion. (Doc. 22 2089.) 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Arpaio’s Motion to Terminate 24 (Doc. 2080) is granted. For the convenience of the parties, those provisions of the Second 25 Amended Judgment that remain in effect are restated in the Third Amended Judgment 26 entered this day. 27 28 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the final evidentiary hearing and oral argument set at 9:30 a.m., July 10, 2012. DATED this 24th day of May, 2012. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?