Beaty, et al v. Schriro, et al

Filing 356

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the Unopposed Motion for Authorization for Habeas Counsel to Conduct State-Court Litigation. (Doc. 355). The Federal Public Defender is authorized to represent Petitioner Beaty in state court to pursue successive state post-conviction relief on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Maples v. Thomas, No. 10-63, 2011 WL 940889 (U.S. March 21, 2011), as well as any clemency proceedings. See Harbison v. Bell, 129 S. Ct. 1481, 1489 n.7 & 1491 (2009). Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/22/11.(LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9

Donald Edward Beaty,

10
11
12
13

Petitioner,
vs.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

CV 92-2076-PHX-SRB
Death Penalty Case
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR A UTHORIZATION FOR H ABEAS
COUNSEL TO CONDUCT STATE-COURT
LITIGATION

Respondents.

14
15
16

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Authorization for
Habeas Counsel to Conduct State-Court Litigation. (Doc. 355). Good cause appearing,

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the Unopposed Motion for Authorization for

18

Habeas Counsel to Conduct State-Court Litigation. (Doc. 355). The Federal Public

19

Defender is authorized to represent Petitioner Beaty in state court to pursue successive state

20

post-conviction relief on the basis of the United States Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari

21

in Maples v. Thomas, No. 10-63, 2011 WL 940889 (U.S. March 21, 2011), as well as any

22

clemency proceedings. See Harbison v. Bell, 129 S. Ct. 1481, 1489 n.7 & 1491 (2009).

23

DATED this 22nd day of April, 2011.

24
25
26
27
28

-1-