Styers, et al v. Stewart, et al

Filing 165

ORDER denying without prejudice 164 Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 2/9/12.(DMT)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 James Lynn Styers, Petitioner, 10 11 vs. 12 Charles L. Ryan, et al., 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-98-2244-PHX-JAT DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER Before the Court is Respondents’ motion for extension of time to February 14 to file a response to Petitioner’s motion to enter judgment. (Doc. 164.) The motion fails to state the position of opposing counsel or include a proposed form of order, as required by Local Rule Civil 7.3 and Section II.G.1 of the Electronic Case File Administrative Policies and Procedure Manual. Furthermore, it appears the continuance being sought is unnecessary. Petitioner’s motion was filed on January 25, 2012. Under Local Rule Civil 7.2(c) and Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Respondents’ response is due February 13, 2012. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 164) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 9th day of February, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?