Gagan, et al v. Sharar, et al
Filing
468
ORDER that the court hereby VACATES the 462 Order setting a hearing in this matter as to Kim Sullivan for March 1, 2013. Consistent with its prior order, upon completion of such discovery, the court will set a hearing date within two weeks thereof. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/28/2013. (LFIG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
James L. Gagan,
c/o David G. Bray
Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre
Friedlander, P.A.
2901 N. Central Ave.,
Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85012,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff/Judgment
)
Creditor,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
James A. Monroe
)
12880 East Mercer Lane
)
Scottsdale, AZ 85259,
)
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,)
Kim Sullivan a/k/a
)
Kimberley
)
Sullivan a/k/a Kim Monroe )
a/k/a Kimberley Monroe
)
a/k/a/ Kimberley Martin
)
a/k/a Kimberly Perry
)
a/k/a Kimberley Pirtle
)
a/k/a Kimberley Clark
)
12880 East Mercer Lane
)
Scottsdale, AZ 85259,
)
Garnishee Defendant.
)
)
No. CIV 99-1427-PHX-RCB
O R D E R
26
On February 8, 2013, this court, among other things,
27
granted plaintiff James L. Gagan’s motion to extend the time for
28
completion of discovery with respect to garnishee defendant Kim
1
Sullivan.
Ord. (Doc. 457) at 2, ¶ 4.
The court ordered such
2
discovery to be completed within 45 days from February 8, 2013
3
– the date of entry of that order.
4
extension, the court hereby VACATES the order (doc. 462) setting
5
a hearing in this matter as to Kim Sullivan for March 1, 2013.
6
Consistent
7
discovery, the court will set a hearing date within two weeks
8
thereof.
9
with
its
prior
order,
See id.
upon
In light of that
completion
of
such
See Ord. (Doc. 449) at 5:25-6:1.
DATED this 28TH day of February, 2013.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Copies to counsel of record and defendant garnishee Kim Sullivan
and defendant James A. Monroe
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
s:\clr\misc\vacatehearingSullivan
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?