Gagan, et al v. Sharar, et al

Filing 519

ORDER - ORDERED denying 515 Defendant James Monroe's Motion/Request for Evidentiary Hearing/Oral Argument. FURTHER ORDERED denying 517 Plaintiff's Joinder in Defendant Monroe's Motion/Request for Oral Argument and Motion for Expedited Hearing. (See attached Order for details.) Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/6/2014.(TLB)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 James L Gagan, Plaintiff, 10 No. CV-99-01427-PHX-RCB No. CV-13-01113-PHX-RCB ORDER 11 v. 12 Victor E Sharar, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendant James Monroe, as well as the defendants in Gagan v. Monroe, No. CV- 16 13-011113 (“Gagan II”), are requesting that the court set an evidentiary hearing and oral 17 18 argument on defendant Monroe’s pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 494). Mot. (Doc. 19 515). The defendants give no reasons for either aspect of this request. On December 20, 20 2013, plaintiff Gagan joined in this defense request. “Plaintiff’s Joinder in Defendant 21 Monroe’s Request for Oral Argument and Motion for Expedited Hearing” (Doc. 517). 22 23 Plaintiff also does not offer any reasons for requesting oral argument. However, he 24 expressly opposes defendant Monroe’s request for an evidentiary hearing because the 25 defense motion to dismiss presents a purely legal issue. Essentially viewing defendant 26 27 28 Monroe’s motion to dismiss as a means “to continue to stymie and delay [his] discovery efforts both in this case and in” Gagan II, id. at 2:4-5, plaintiff Gagan also is requesting 1 2 that the court consider the motion to dismiss on an expedited basis. Id. at 1:24-25. Given the court’s intimate familiarity with this action and Fidelity Nat. Financial, 3 4 5 6 Inc. v. Friedman, No. CV-03-1222-PHX-RCB, which is the primary basis for defendant Monroe’s dismissal argument, and because the issues have been fully briefed, in its discretion, the court denies the parties’ requests for an evidentiary hearing and oral 7 8 argument as it would not aid the decisional process. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); Partridge v. 9 Reich, 141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998). The court also denies plaintiff Gagan’s request 10 to consider the defense motion on an expedited basis. Any urgency is mitigated by the 11 court’s prior orders staying discovery in this action (Doc. 518) and granting, inter alia, 12 13 defendant Monroe’s motion to suspend deadlines and for a protective order in the closely 14 related Gagan II action (Doc. 33). 15 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 16 17 18 19 (1) Defendant James Monroe’s “Request for Evidentiary Hearing/Oral Argument” (Doc. 515) is DENIED; and (2) “Plaintiff’s Joinder in Defendant Monroe’s Request for Oral Argument and 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Motion for Expedited Hearing” (Doc. 517) is DENIED. Dated this 6th day of January, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?