Gonzales, et al v. Schriro, et al
Filing
237
ORDER re 236 Motion (Request) for Ruling. The Court appreciates the matter being brought to its attention, and is attempting to resolve the remaining issues in this case in due course. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/3/15.(LAD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9
10
Ernest Valencia Gonzales,
No. CV-99-02016-PHX-SMM
Petitioner,
11
ORDER
12
v.
13
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
Counsel for Respondents has filed a request for ruling asking the court to prioritize
17
18
19
its consideration of Petitioner’s 25 remaining habeas claims. (Doc. 236.) The Court
understands Respondents’ position. As counsel aptly notes, the prescriptive time for
20
21
ruling has not yet passed, and the case has a lengthy and complicated procedural history.
22
Of course, counsel is also aware of the many cases that have been remanded to this Court
23
for reconsideration under Martinez v. Ryan, in addition to the Court’s already heavy
24
25
docket.
The Court appreciates the matter being brought to its attention, and is attempting
26
27
28
...
1
2
to resolve the remaining issues in this case in due course.
DATED this 3rd day of March, 2015.
3
4
5
Honorable Stephen M. McNamee
Senior United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?