Dream Games of AZ, et al v. PC Onsite LLC, et al
Filing
542
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Willett's R&R, (Doc. #541 ), is ACCEPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment Creditor's Application for Charging Order, (Doc. #522 ), is GRANTED. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that a charging order against the interest or interests of Judgment Debtor, Casey Hagon, in C&D Consulting LLC, a Texas limited liability company, is GRANTED and such interest or interests shall be charged with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the Judgment debt owing to Judgment Creditor, with interest thereon until paid. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that C&D Consulting, LLC shall provide Judgment Creditor with quarterly financial statements and an accounting of all disbursements to Judgment Debtor, or for the benefit of Judgment Debtor, within 21 days after the conclusion of each calendar quarter, from the date of this Order until the Judgment is fully satisfied. Such documents shall be mailed to Windtberg &Zdancewicz, PLC, 7551 S. Willow Dr., Suite 102, Tempe, Arizona 85283, or such other address as provided by Judgment Creditor. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/18/2016. (KMG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Dream Games of Arizona Incorporated, et
al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
No. CV-03-00433-PHX-DLR
ORDER
v.
PC Onsite LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Before the Court is Plaintiff Dream Games of Arizona, Inc.’s (“Judgment
17
Creditor”) Application for Charging Order and United States Magistrate Eileen S.
18
Willett’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).
19
recommends that the Court grant the Application and issue a charging order in the form
20
proposed by Judgment Creditor. (Doc. 541 at 8.) Magistrate Judge Willett advised the
21
parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file
22
timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R.
23
(Id. at 8-9 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
24
(9th Cir. 2003)). No party filed objections, thus relieving the Court of its obligation to
25
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
26
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
27
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
28
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
(Docs. 522, 541.)
The R&R
1
objected to.”). The Court nonetheless has reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-
2
taken. The Court will accept the R&R, grant Judgment Creditor’s Application, and issue
3
the charging order in the form proposed by the Judgment Creditor. See 28 U.S.C. §
4
636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in
5
part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3)
6
(“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive
7
further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).
8
9
10
11
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Willett’s R&R, (Doc. 541), is
ACCEPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment Creditor’s Application for Charging
Order, (Doc. 522), is GRANTED.
12
IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that a charging order against the interest or interests
13
of Judgment Debtor, Casey Hagon, in C&D Consulting LLC, a Texas limited liability
14
company, is GRANTED and such interest or interests shall be charged with payment of
15
the unsatisfied amount of the Judgment debt owing to Judgment Creditor, with interest
16
thereon until paid.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that C&D Consulting, LLC shall provide
18
Judgment Creditor with quarterly financial statements and an accounting of all
19
disbursements to Judgment Debtor, or for the benefit of Judgment Debtor, within 21 days
20
after the conclusion of each calendar quarter, from the date of this Order until the
21
Judgment is fully satisfied.
22
Zdancewicz, PLC, 7551 S. Willow Dr., Suite 102, Tempe, Arizona 85283, or such other
23
address as provided by Judgment Creditor.
24
Such documents shall be mailed to Windtberg &
Dated this 18th day of April, 2016.
25
26
27
28
Douglas L. Rayes
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?